Solana Greenlights Alpenglow, Its Most Explosive Upgrade Yet

Solana validators have overwhelmingly approved SIMD-0326 “Alpenglow,” a sweeping consensus rewrite that aims to cut transaction finality from roughly 12.8 seconds to about 150 milliseconds—a 100x reduction that developers and observers are already calling the most consequential upgrade in the network’s ￰0￱ to the official tally shared via Solana Status, 98.27% of stake voted Yes, 1.05% voted No, and 0.69% abstained, with 52% of total stake ￰1￱ Slashes Finality By 100x “The community governance process for SIMD-0326: Alpenglow is ￰2￱ proposal has passed: 98.27% Yes, 1.05% No, 0.69% Abstain; 52% of stake cast a vote,” Solana Status posted on X on September 2.

Anza, the Solana R&D firm that authored the proposal, added context for operators: “Mainnet-beta is in epoch 843 which concludes the voting process for SIMD-0326: ￰3￱ proposal has passed with 98% of stake voting Yes.” JUST IN: Alpenglow, the most significant consensus upgrade proposal in @Solana ‘s history, aiming for 150ms block finality, has passed governance. 98.27% voted ‘Yes’, 1.05% voted ‘No’, with 52% of the Network stake ￰4￱ — SolanaFloor (@SolanaFloor) September 2, 2025 Alpenglow replaces core elements of the existing consensus— Proof-of-History (PoH) and TowerBFT—with two new components designed for real-time performance: Votor, a direct-vote finality engine that achieves sub-second confirmations via single-round finalization in the “fast path” (when ~80% of stake is responsive) or two rounds in a 60% fallback; and Rotor, a streamlined block propagation layer intended to supplant Turbine and cut network ￰5￱ practice, that architecture is what underpins the ~150–200 ms confirmation ￰6￱ raw speed, Alpenglow touches validator economics and fault ￰7￱ vote transactions moving off-chain, Solana will eliminate per-slot vote fees and introduce a fixed Validator Admission Ticket (VAT)—initially 1.6 SOL per epoch—that is ￰8￱ model aims to preserve economic friction against spam even as vote traffic leaves the ledger, while simplifying load on the network.

Separately, the design targets a “20+20” resilience envelope: safety if up to 20% of stake is adversarial and liveness if an additional, disjoint 20% is ￰9￱ mechanics were debated in the forum during the governance window and were reiterated in technical explainers ahead of the ￰10￱ mechanics and ￰11￱ governance process followed the steps laid out on the Solana forum: discussion in epochs 833–838, stake weights captured in epoch 839, and voting in epochs 840–842, with passage defined as Yes ≥ two-thirds of (Yes + No) and a 33% quorum in which abstentions count toward quorum. Anza’s epoch-843 note simply marks the moment the chain passed the voting boundary on ￰12￱ the validator signal secured, Alpenglow now moves from governance to engineering ￰13￱ it ultimately delivers stable ~150 ms finality at scale is a question only testnet and mainnet can answer—but the 98% approval makes clear the Solana ecosystem’s directional bet: real-time ￰14￱ official implementation schedule remains ￰15￱ press time, SOL traded at $209.