Ripple’s Recent Move Raises Questions About XRP Escrow Ownership

A recent post from Nietzbux (@nietzbux), a well-known crypto enthusiast in the XRP community, raised an interesting question about Ripple’s decision to purchase new XRP with fresh capital instead of utilizing existing tokens held in ￰0￱ comment offered a perspective that challenges common assumptions about the company’s ￰1￱ recently announced plans to raise $1 billion to purchase XRP , and Nietzbux wrote that “there are several reasons Ripple would buy new XRP with new capital for a treasury,” but pointed out that many continue to ask why the company would not simply move tokens from its escrow ￰2￱ Pre-allocation Theory He then introduced what he described as a purely speculative factor, suggesting that “maybe the pre-allocation theory is correct and Ripple has less XRP in the escrow than the public thinks.” The idea hints at a possible scenario where a portion of the tokens held in escrow may already be committed to private arrangements, potentially explaining Ripple’s continued market activity despite its large nominal ￰3￱ interpretation challenges the view that Ripple’s escrow is entirely available for company use.

Nietzbux’s speculation resonates with long-running theories within the XRP community about pre-allocated holdings and private agreements with financial ￰4￱ accurate, this could mean that Ripple’s available supply is smaller than most believe, a situation that would theoretically support stronger long-term market dynamics for XRP due to tighter ￰5￱ are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Public Transparency and Market Interpretation Following the post, community members questioned the premise, noting that Ripple has publicly stated the amount of XRP held in ￰6￱ acknowledged that the escrow and its total are indeed public, but clarified that Ripple’s ownership of all tokens in escrow isn’t public ￰7￱ experts agree that Ripple cannot freely sell off the tokens in escrow , this distinction drew attention to an important technical point, as public blockchain data can verify how much XRP is locked.

Still, ownership details and contractual obligations related to those tokens may remain ￰8￱ user sought clarification on the term “pre-allocation,” asking whether it referred to XRP being set aside for Ripple’s banking ￰9￱ has partnerships with over 300 banks and institutions across the globe, and Nietzbux explained that pre-allocation in this context would mean tokens have already been sold to some of these institutions, and are being kept in escrow until ￰10￱ such pre-allocation exists, Ripple’s decision to buy XRP directly could reflect an effort to maintain liquidity and support price ￰11￱ investors, this scenario would suggest that Ripple’s financial behavior aligns with a long-term effort to preserve confidence in XRP’s market ￰12￱ : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial ￰13￱ views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s ￰14￱ are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment ￰15￱ action taken by the reader is strictly at their own ￰16￱ Tabloid is not responsible for any financial ￰17￱ us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News