Here’s Why SHIB Holders May Not Retire Even at $0.001 Dreams

Shiba Inu investors who expect to achieve financial independence when the token reaches $0.001 may need to reassess their ￰0￱ strong community enthusiasm and years of promotion, several fundamental and structural challenges make such a milestone highly improbable under current ￰1￱ Core Issue: Excessive Token Supply The greatest barrier to Shiba Inu’s $0.001 target is its overwhelming token ￰2￱ approximately 41% of the initial supply has been permanently removed from circulation, mainly due to Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin’s large-scale burn in 2021, the asset still maintains a circulating supply of around 589 trillion ￰3￱ figure remains too high to support substantial price growth without enormous capital ￰4￱ the current burn pace, it would likely take several decades to reduce supply to a level where $0.001 could be ￰5￱ small price increases now require disproportionately large amounts of new investment, making each upward movement progressively harder to ￰6￱ Institutional Engagement Shiba Inu’s growth has largely relied on retail enthusiasm, with minimal participation from institutional ￰7￱ Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Solana, which have each attracted attention from major asset managers and corporations, SHIB has not yet secured any significant institutional ￰8￱ Sweden-based Valour ￰9￱ a Shiba Inu exchange-traded product (ETP) to provide limited exposure, the initiative has not meaningfully boosted investor confidence or ￰10￱ absence of a U.

S.-listed spot ETF further reinforces the perception that SHIB remains a speculative asset rather than a serious investment ￰11￱ and Leadership Concerns Another challenge lies in the project’s governance ￰12￱ Inu’s leadership, headed by the pseudonymous developer Shytoshi Kusama, has chosen to remain ￰13￱ anonymity once added intrigue to the project’s identity, it now raises transparency and accountability issues that deter institutional ￰14￱ comparison, projects led by visible figures such as Vitalik Buterin (Ethereum) or Charles Hoskinson (Cardano) have earned more credibility, partly because investors can assess the leadership’s track record and ￰15￱ Inu’s lack of identifiable management continues to restrict its legitimacy in traditional financial ￰16￱ Utility and Adoption Despite efforts to expand its ecosystem through initiatives like Shibarium, ShibaSwap, and the Shib Metaverse, the project has yet to establish a core use case that drives consistent demand beyond ￰17￱ developments have generated community excitement but have not translated into sustained real-world utility or significant on-chain ￰18￱ Focus and Internal Disputes In recent months, Shiba Inu’s leadership has also been linked to projects outside its primary ￰19￱ Kusama’s support for the separate meme token “SHY” is a notable ￰20￱ diversions risk fragmenting the community’s focus and redirecting liquidity away from SHIB ￰21￱ are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Further complicating matters, internal disagreements have reportedly surfaced among ￰22￱ a public statement, developer Kaal Dhairya alluded to tensions within the team, noting that several individuals who previously benefited from Shiba Inu had departed the ￰23￱ divisions of this nature can slow progress, delay deliverables, and erode investor ￰24￱ Inu’s path to $0.001 is obstructed by structural realities that extend far beyond community ￰25￱ massive circulating supply, lack of institutional adoption, anonymous leadership, and absence of strong utility collectively undermine the token’s long-term ￰26￱ these core challenges are addressed and the project demonstrates measurable progress in reducing supply and increasing practical adoption, the $0.001 dream is likely to remain out of reach for ￰27￱ : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial ￰28￱ views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s ￰29￱ are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment ￰30￱ action taken by the reader is strictly at their own ￰31￱ Tabloid is not responsible for any financial ￰32￱ us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News