Here’s Why Ripple (XRP) and Tokenized Settlement Remain in SWIFT Payment Game

SWIFT has introduced a new initiative to upgrade cross-border retail payments for both consumers and small ￰1￱ to the announcement , the plan involves collaboration with some of the largest global ￰2￱ stated goal is to make international payments function with the same speed and predictability as domestic ￰3￱ aspects highlighted include faster confirmations, standardized fee structures, and a more transparent user ￰4￱ emphasizing predictability and efficiency, SWIFT presents this program as a direct step toward modernizing international retail ￰5￱ Van Code’s Response Software engineer Vincent Van Code examined the announcement and raised significant concerns about its ￰6￱ acknowledged that the improvements SWIFT outlined may enhance the user interface and provide greater clarity in fee reporting.

However, he argued that these updates do not solve the underlying structural issues of the current ￰7￱ his view, SWIFT’s roadmap remains focused on messaging enhancements rather than on true settlement ￰8￱ stressed that capital remains tied up in the existing framework of nostro and vostro accounts, with liquidity inefficiencies left ￰9￱ his perspective, this is a critical weakness, as pre-funded accounts continue to trap funds across multiple ￰10￱ pointed to on-demand liquidity solutions as examples of how these inefficiencies can be eliminated rather than just managed. Cross-Border Payments: Fixing the Surface, Ignoring the Core Swift’s new roadmap paints a picture of progress — faster confirmations, clearer fees, and cleaner user ￰11￱ beneath the polished surface, the structural issues remain ￰12￱ still gets… ￰0￱ — Vincent Van Code (@vincent_vancode) September 25, 2025 Settlement and Liquidity Concerns Van Code emphasized that while faster confirmations and transparency provide a smoother user experience, they do not constitute real-time ￰13￱ core issue, he argued, lies in how money actually moves across ￰14￱ reliance on correspondent banking chains means settlement delays persist regardless of messaging improvements.

This, he said, makes SWIFT’s plan an incremental update to presentation rather than a fundamental redesign of how cross-border payments are ￰15￱ and Digital Assets The software engineer also questioned the effectiveness of enhancements such as ISO ￰16￱ acknowledging that richer data formats can improve the transmission of information, he pointed out that additional data does not lower costs, remove friction, or mitigate counterparty ￰17￱ his view, transparency in expected delivery times is a cosmetic improvement compared to achieving real-time settlement ￰18￱ Code contrasted this with digital asset-based solutions, where settlement and liquidity challenges can be addressed directly through tokenized value ￰19￱ noted that SWIFT continues to treat digital assets and stablecoins as experimental, while platforms using blockchain-based settlement already operate in live corridors with measurable ￰20￱ are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Incrementalism ￰21￱ Change A central point in Van Code’s critique is that incremental change benefits incumbents who prefer to maintain existing ￰22￱ contrast, disruptive alternatives focus on eliminating inefficiencies rather than layering improvements onto legacy ￰23￱ argued that the choice the industry faces is between optimizing older infrastructure and building entirely new payment rails capable of addressing liquidity, cost, and settlement challenges at the root level.

SWIFT’s new program positions itself as a meaningful improvement for consumers and small businesses, aiming to provide more predictable and efficient international transfers. However, Vincent Van Code’s analysis draws attention to the limits of this approach, pointing out that liquidity inefficiencies, delayed settlement, and reliance on legacy structures remain ￰24￱ contrast highlights two different paths forward for global payments: enhancing existing systems with incremental upgrades or pursuing structural solutions built on tokenized settlement ￰25￱ : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial ￰26￱ views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s ￰27￱ are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment ￰28￱ action taken by the reader is strictly at their own ￰29￱ Tabloid is not responsible for any financial ￰30￱ us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News