Uphold CEO: As a Matter of Law, XRP Was Not a Security

When the ￰0￱ and Exchange Commission (SEC) sued Ripple Labs in December 2020, nearly every major American exchange delisted ￰1￱ ￰2￱ ￰3￱ global trading platform stood out by continuing to offer XRP to customers despite the legal battle. A newly shared video on X by ALLINCRYPTO captures Chief Executive Officer Simon McLoughlin explaining why Uphold made that choice and why, years later, he feels “very proud and vindicated.” Uphold’s Legal Rationale McLoughlin said the decision was grounded in a simple principle: the courts had not yet ruled on XRP’s legal status. “As a matter of law, XRP was not a security,” he stated, recalling that when the SEC first filed its complaint, “it had not been adjudicated upon,” so Uphold concluded “the right thing to do was to continue to support XRP until the courts had ruled upon it.” The company held firm against delisting pressure , prioritizing due process over following industry trends. @UpholdInc CEO Simon McLoughlin on deciding to not delist $XRP during Ripple's battle with the SEC's Gary Gensler and to instead show support for the token:"As a matter of law, XRP was not a security." ￰4￱ — ALLINCRYPTO (@RealAllinCrypto) September 22, 2025 SEC’s Stance and Market Impact The CEO noted that the SEC never directly ordered the removal of XRP from trading platforms.

“All of the ￰5￱ had delisted XRP and effectively caused detriment to U. S. consumers,” he noted, yet “the SEC said we never asked them to,” a development he believes “vindicated our stance.” By continuing to offer XRP, Uphold preserved market access for customers who would otherwise have been sidelined during a critical ￰6￱ are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Court Rulings Confirm the View Legal developments have since validated Uphold’s ￰7￱ July 2023, ￰8￱ Judge Analisa Torres ruled that while certain institutional sales of XRP qualified as securities transactions, sales on public exchanges did ￰9￱ a failed settlement attempt, both the SEC and Ripple withdrew their appeals in August 2025 , leaving intact the court’s finding that secondary-market sales of XRP are not ￰10￱ McLoughlin, this outcome confirms the reasoning that guided Uphold’s original decision.

A Stand for Due Process Looking back, McLoughlin emphasized the satisfaction of staying the course. “We’re very proud and feel vindicated that we did support it for those two years ,” he said, adding that it was “very gratifying this year to see the ￰11￱ basically reject the majority of the SEC’s complaints against Ripple.” By standing firm, Uphold illustrates how exchanges can harmonize regulatory diligence with customer ￰12￱ refusing to delist until a final judgment, the company demonstrated confidence in the legal system and in XRP’s status—proving, as McLoughlin told ALLINCRYPTO, that “as a matter of law… XRP was not a security .” Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial ￰13￱ views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s ￰14￱ are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment ￰15￱ action taken by the reader is strictly at their own ￰16￱ Tabloid is not responsible for any financial ￰17￱ us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News