Ted Cruz’s Objection Could Slow Bitcoin Community Push to Restrict Data Broker Access

Ted Cruz blocked Senate Bill 2850 and a narrower follow-up, arguing that sweeping limits on data broker access could hinder law enforcement tracking of violent offenders; he proposed refining protections to balance privacy and public safety while offering to work with Senator Wyden on ￰0￱ Cruz blocked SB 2850 and SB 2851 to seek clearer law-enforcement carve-outs SB 2850 would restrict data brokers from selling sensitive personal data to the ￰1￱ context: over 50 crypto-related home attacks were recorded in 2025, per a public database managed by Jameson ￰2￱ Cruz blocks privacy bill SB 2850 that limits data brokers; COINOTAG explains the dispute, implications for public safety and privacy, and next steps for ￰3￱ is SB 2850 and why did Ted Cruz block it?

SB 2850 is a Senate privacy bill intended to curb data brokers from selling sensitive personal ￰4￱ Ted Cruz objected, saying the bill as written could impede law enforcement access to critical data and needs refinement to protect public safety while limiting broad data ￰5￱ does SB 2851 differ from SB 2850? SB 2851 is a narrower proposal that would extend protections primarily to federal lawmakers, state officials and staff, and survivors of sexual assault and domestic ￰6￱ also blocked SB 2851, citing similar concerns about potential gaps for law enforcement access and arguing for more targeted language. , "description": "Senator Ted Cruz blocked two bipartisan privacy bills (SB 2850 and SB 2851), citing concerns that the measures could limit law enforcement access to data needed to prevent violence and protect children." Two bipartisan bills to protect the data of all Americans were blocked by Senator Ted Cruz, who argued it may affect law enforcement efforts to track down ￰7￱ Senator Ted Cruz objected to Senate Bill 2850 , a bipartisan proposal by Senator Ron Wyden to restrict data brokers from selling sensitive personal information broadly to the ￰8￱ said the bill needed refinement to preserve law enforcement tools used to locate convicted and suspected violent ￰9￱ vote drew attention because Cruz was the lone senator to formally object on ￰10￱ clarified he supports expanding privacy protections broadly where practicable, but said the current text risks unintended public-safety ￰11￱ introduced SB 2850 to curb the sale of names, home addresses, phone numbers, and other sensitive data that can be bought by “anyone with a credit card.” Wyden argued the data fuels stalking, targeted violence, and ￰12￱ also blocked a narrower follow-up, SB 2851 , intended to protect federal lawmakers, state officials and staff, and survivors of sexual assault and domestic ￰13￱ cited the same concerns and offered to work with Wyden to find language that balances privacy and investigatory needs.) SB 2851 (Narrow) Scope All Americans’ data Lawmakers, officials, and certain survivors Primary aim Limit data broker sales to public Extend protections for specific high-risk groups Law enforcement carve-outs Not explicit enough per objection Also deemed insufficient by objector Frequently Asked Questions Why did Ted Cruz block SB 2850?

Cruz blocked SB 2850 because he believes the bill, as drafted, may restrict law enforcement access to data used in locating violent offenders and protecting ￰14￱ called for clearer, practicable exceptions and offered to work on ￰15￱ blocking SB 2850 stop privacy reform in Congress? Blocking the bill delays immediate enactment but does not end reform ￰16￱ signaled interest in compromise language to protect both privacy and public safety, making further negotiation likely. , "totalTime": "PT2M" Key Takeaways Single-senator objection : Ted Cruz blocked both bills, citing law enforcement ￰17￱ matters : SB 2850 is broad; SB 2851 is narrow—both need clearer ￰18￱ steps : Bipartisan talks and refined drafting are expected to reconcile privacy protections with public-safety ￰19￱ Senate debate over SB 2850 and SB 2851 highlights the challenge of protecting Americans from data-broker exposure while preserving investigative ￰20￱ will monitor negotiations as Senators pursue precise language to secure privacy without compromising public ￰21￱ further bipartisan drafting and stakeholder input in the coming weeks.

Published: 2025-10-02 · Updated: 2025-10-02 · Author: COINOTAG