A federal jury in Marshall, Texas, has ordered Samsung Electronics to pay nearly $445.5 million to Collision Communications for infringing patents related to 4G, 5G, and Wi-Fi network 0 ruling represents one of the biggest patent verdicts against the South Korean tech conglomerate in recent 1 jury ruled that Samsung’s Galaxy phones, laptops, and other wireless products employed technology that infringed on four patents owned by Collision 2 verdict came following a four-and-a-half-day trial and two hours of jury 3 case was presided over by 4 Judge Rodney Gilstrap at the Eastern District of Texas, a court known for handling major patent 5 rules Samsung copied Collision’s network technology Collision said Samsung devices used its technology without permission or payment for the rights to use 6 company stated that Samsung has become very popular by utilizing technology that did not belong to 7 the same time, Collision struggled for years to bring that same technology to market 8 jury reviewed evidence from Samsung’s own emails and technical documents that showed Samsung had known about Collision’s patents long before the 9 companies discussed possible business partnerships and licensing deals for the patented technology between 2011 and 10 testified that the tech heavyweight’s engineers and managers clearly understood the value of the technology and even praised its ability to reduce interference and improve data 11 features could make Samsung’s products more competitive, but the firm walked away from the discussions without signing any agreement or paying for the 12 company continued to release devices that used the same patented 13 jury awarded $445,484,160 in damages to Collision 14 imposed a running royalty, meaning Samsung would be liable for additional payments in the future if it continues to sell phones, laptops, or other devices that utilize the same 15 16 wins major case after years of legal battle Collision Communications spent more than ten years fighting to protect its inventions from Samsung 17 attorney Brad Caldwell from Caldwell Cassady & Curry in Dallas said the victory represented recognition and respect for honest, hard 18 explained that the founders of Collision had invested not only their time but also a significant portion of their savings and energy in developing their technology and keeping it alive through years of 19 described the trial as among the most challenging his team had worked on, devoting much of its effort to simplifying some complex concepts about how wireless signals are transmitted between wireless phones, cellphone towers, and routers, so that jurors could understand 20 team worked for months to write clear explanations that would make the science easy to understand.
Samsung’s attorneys, Victoria 21 and Sean Pak of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, denied the allegations and contended that the patents were 22 said the smartphone manufacturer’s own engineers had independently developed their versions of the technology and had not copied Collision’s 23 jury found that the tech firm committed willful infringement because it was aware of the inventions but proceeded to use them 24 and its lawyers have not yet publicly commented on the case, although they could still appeal the 25 smartest crypto minds already read our 26 in? Join them .
Story Tags

Latest news and analysis from Cryptopolitan



