Pundit: Forget Market Cap Myth, XRP Can Hit $10, $100, and $1,000. Here’s why

Recent remarks by crypto enthusiast BD have brought renewed attention to a controversial topic within the XRP community—how high XRP can realistically ￰0￱ than focusing on external trends or unrelated comparisons, BD directly addressed a recurring argument: the claim that market capitalization prevents XRP from reaching significant price levels such as $10, $100, or ￰1￱ comments drew contrasting responses, revealing ongoing disagreement over whether belief or hard valuation metrics determine XRP’s ￰2￱ love using market cap as an excuse to say XRP can’t hit $10, $100, or $1,000. But ask yourself this: if “market cap” was the reason XRP can’t go higher, then how did it go from $0.004 in 2014 to $3.50 in 2018, and do it again in 2025?

What limits the price isn’t reality.… — BD (@DiepSanh) October 10, 2025 BD’s Position on Price Limits and Market Cap BD questioned the widespread reliance on market cap as a conclusive barrier to XRP’s price ￰3￱ pointed to XRP’s historical performance, referencing how the asset climbed from fractions of a cent in 2014 to over $3 in ￰4￱ his view, this past performance undermines the argument that market cap alone restricts potential ￰5￱ suggested that limitations often come from investor perception rather than actual market mechanics, implying that belief and conviction play a role in driving speculative ￰6￱ stance aligns with long-term holders who argue that as adoption, liquidity, and utility expand, traditional valuation models may become less ￰7￱ these supporters, dismissing high price targets solely based on market cap calculations overlooks the unprecedented behavior of digital ￰8￱ Focused on Realistic Valuation In response, August offered a sharply contrasting perspective, emphasizing that belief cannot override economic ￰9￱ outlined projections, noting that XRP at $10 would require a market cap of approximately $500 billion, at $100, around $5 trillion, and at $1,000, over $50 trillion—figures exceeding the global money ￰10￱ argued that XRP’s 2017 surge was driven by speculation rather than utility, concluding that real-world metrics ultimately constrain price, not ￰11￱ viewpoint reflects a broader skepticism about extremely high valuations in the absence of substantial capital inflows or utility-driven ￰12￱ also highlights a preference for assets perceived as more aligned with market fundamentals, such as ￰13￱ Expectations and Caution from Market Participants Toro Digital Assets offered a middle-ground ￰14￱ acknowledging that XRP may reach moderate targets, such as $10 under favorable circumstances, Toro rejected projections of $100 or $1,000.

He emphasized the importance of understanding market mechanics and criticized long-term holders who have not taken profits despite having years of opportunity. Toro’s remarks focused on practical trading discipline rather than speculative ￰15￱ are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 This approach underscores a segment of the community that supports XRP’s growth potential but rejects extreme valuations without fundamental ￰16￱ also reflects a concern that unrealistic expectations can hinder portfolio ￰17￱ Ongoing Divide Within the Community The exchange highlighted a fundamental divide among XRP supporters.

BD’s emphasis on belief challenges conventional market frameworks, encouraging investors to reconsider perceived ￰18￱ insist that speculative cycles alone cannot sustain disproportionate valuations without real capital ￰19￱ these positions are those who support long-term potential but call for measured expectations and strategic ￰20￱ XRP can reach double or triple-digit prices will ultimately depend on adoption, institutional participation, and broader market ￰21￱ then, belief and reality remain at odds, with the community divided on how far XRP can truly ￰22￱ : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial ￰23￱ views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s ￰24￱ are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment ￰25￱ action taken by the reader is strictly at their own ￰26￱ Tabloid is not responsible for any financial ￰27￱ us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News