Summary In this article, I review and explore techniques to gauge bitcoin’s risk relative to its reward and to assess its portfolio viability relative to other asset 0 believe that the Sharpe Ratio’s use of total realized volatility may have overestimated bitcoin’s true 1 of September 15, bitcoin’s Omega Ratio over the previous year was 1.29, upside returns outpacing downside returns by 29%. By David Puell Introduction This article is written not only for investors with an intermediate-to-advanced degree of knowledge about financial metrics, but also for bitcoin skeptics whose concerns persist even as the asset is maturing in institutional 2 its 16-year history, conservative investors have observed that: “Bitcoin is too volatile,” or, more specifically, “Bitcoin’s returns are not worth the anxiety associated with its volatility.” In our view, such observations miss the nuances of bitcoin’s price history: they fail to separate its upside reward from its downside 3 a result, we believe many, if not most, investors have underallocated to bitcoin in multi-asset 4 this article, I review and explore techniques to gauge bitcoin’s risk relative to its reward and to assess its portfolio viability relative to other asset 5 Sharpe Ratio A widely regarded financial metric, the Sharpe Ratio assesses the potential risk relative to reward of an asset, helping analysts and investors with financial modeling and portfolio 6 to measure the unit of reward per unit of risk, the Sharpe Ratio is constructed as follows: Interestingly, the Sharpe Ratio equates risk to an asset’s total realized volatility over 7 somewhat controversial, that notion is widely applied in financial analysis. 1 How does the Sharpe Ratio measure bitcoin’s risk relative to its reward?
The chart below captures bitcoin’s mean returns and realized volatility—the numerator and denominator of the Sharpe Ratio, respectively—on a yearly basis over the past 14 years. 2 As of September 15, 2025, bitcoin’s yearly returns and volatility have averaged 76.4% and 44.1%, 8 other words, the rewards have been “worth” the risk.) tends to be roughly one and a half times the volatility hurdle of the Sortino Ratio (47%). This implies a “premium” penalty of 70.5%—or 32.7 percentage points (pp)—presented by the Sharpe Ratio over the Sortino Ratio. Sharpe(Total Volatility) Sortino(Downside Volatility) Absolute Premium Relative Premium 2011 177.8% 94.1% 83.7 pp 88.9% 2012 79.6% 49.8% 29.8 pp 59.8% 2013 145.2% 87.2% 58 pp 66.5% 2014 75.2% 46.3% 28.9 pp 62.4% 2015 69.1% 45.5% 23.6 pp 51.9% 2016 48.5% 30% 18.5 pp 61.7% 2017 93.7% 50.2% 43.5 pp 86.7% 2018 81.5% 53.3% 28.2 pp 52.9% 2019 68.1% 38.3% 29.8 pp 77.8% 2020 73.2% 48.7% 24.5 pp 50.3% 2021 80.2% 46.2% 34 pp 73.6% 2022 63.6% 42.3% 21.3 pp 50.4% 2023 43.7% 21.8% 21.9 pp 100.5% 2024 53.3% 28.3% 25 pp 88.3% 2025 (YTD) 44.1% 23.7% 20.4 pp 86.1% Average 79.7% 47% 32.7 pp 70.5%) or downside deviation (Sortino), we now add the Omega Ratio to our analysis because of the clarity it lends to measuring the entirety of the return 9 Omega Ratio evaluates the probability-weighted gains versus losses, making it especially valuable in non-normal or fat-tailed distributions, such as crypto or assets where extreme outcomes are 10 simplified version of the Omega Ratio, also known as Gain/Loss Ratio compares bitcoin’s cumulative positive returns against its cumulative negative returns, defining every unit of reward per unit of risk in a direct, linear 11 this case, we assume 0% returns as the minimum “hurdle” the investor would expect for holding the 12 with the Sortino Ratio, we believe the Omega Ratio portrays a more accurate measurement of risk-adjusted 13 provide color with respect to bitcoin, the chart below differentiates between the numerator and denominator of bitcoin’s Omega Ratio.), Bloomberg 14 Float Adjusted Index (LBUFTRUU, US bonds), MSCI US REIT Index (RMZ, US real estate), and LBMA Gold Price PM (GOLDLNPM, gold).), Bloomberg 15 Float Adjusted Index (LBUFTRUU, US bonds), MSCI US REIT Index (RMZ, US real estate), and LBMA Gold Price PM (GOLDLNPM, gold).), Bloomberg 16 Float Adjusted Index (LBUFTRUU, US bonds), MSCI US REIT Index (RMZ, US real estate), and LBMA Gold Price PM (GOLDLNPM, gold).), Bloomberg 17 Float Adjusted Index (LBUFTRUU, US bonds), MSCI US REIT Index (RMZ, US real estate), and LBMA Gold Price PM (GOLDLNPM, gold).).
All content is original and has been researched and produced by ARK unless otherwise 18 part of ARK’s original content may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of 19 content is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice or an offer or solicitation in respect to any products or services for any persons who are prohibited from receiving such information under the laws applicable to their place of citizenship, domicile or 20 of the statements contained on this website may be statements of future expectations and other forward-looking statements that are based on ARK's current views and assumptions, and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such 21 content is subject to change without 22 statements made regarding companies or securities or other financial information on this site or any sites relating to ARK are strictly beliefs and points of view held by ARK or the third party making such statement and are not endorsements by ARK of any company or security or recommendations by ARK to buy, sell or hold any 23 content presented does not constitute investment advice, should not be used as the basis for any investment decision, and does not purport to provide any legal, tax or accounting 24 remember that there are inherent risks involved with investing in the markets, and your investments may be worth more or less than your initial investment upon 25 is no guarantee that ARK's objectives will be achieved.
Further, there is no assurance that any strategies, methods, sectors, or any investment programs herein were or will prove to be profitable, or that any investment recommendations or decisions we make in the future will be profitable for any investor or 26 money management is not suitable for all 27 full disclosures, please go to our Terms & Conditions 28 Adviser did not pay a fee to be considered for or granted the 29 Adviser did not pay any fee to the grantor of the awards for the right to promote the Adviser's receipt of the awards nor was the Adviser required to be a member of an organization to be eligible for the 30 full Award Disclosure, please go to our Terms & Conditions 31 performance is not indicative of future 32 Post Editor's Note: The summary bullets for this article were chosen by Seeking Alpha editors.
Story Tags

Latest news and analysis from Seeking Alpha



