FTX withdraws proposal to forfeit $800M in customer claims

FTX has dropped its controversial plan to classify nearly $800 million in customer claims across 49 countries as “restricted” and potentially subject to forfeiture, marking a major victory for international creditors of the collapsed crypto ￰0￱ FTX Recovery Trust filed a formal notice of withdrawal with the Delaware bankruptcy court, reversing a proposal that had sparked strong opposition from creditor groups, particularly in China, which accounted for the majority of the affected ￰1￱ changes its plan for bankruptcy after pressure from international creditors FTX initially requested a ￰2￱ to approve a “Restricted Jurisdiction Procedure” to determine the countries where local laws and government restrictions make it difficult to compensate ￰3￱ company aimed to simplify the repayment process, but instead, customers became angry when they discovered they would lose everything simply because of their ￰4￱ plan was to hire lawyers in each of the 49 countries to check if the repayment process was ￰5￱ in these regions would automatically lose their repayment right if the lawyer found out that the process broke local laws, and their money would be distributed among other ￰6￱ customers said the plan was unfair and discriminatory because users had already suffered big losses and should not be punished further just because of legal or political issues in their ￰7￱ Ji, an investor based in Singapore, led 300 Chinese claimants and filed an official objection in a Delaware bankruptcy ￰8￱ said FTX had no solid reason to include China in the list of restricted countries and that if the court approved the plan, other big companies would start denying customers payments simply based on ￰9￱ withdrew the motion after facing a lot of backlash, and many creditors are happy because customers will now get the money they ￰10￱ welcome the reversal of bankruptcy as FTX focuses on repayment and appeal Many customers were pleased and said it felt like FTX was finally addressing their ￰11￱ also showed that the company wants to reduce new legal fights because if their plea was approved, customers would rise up again to fight it in court.

Similarly, many creditors said they felt left out because most of the discussions and court actions took place in the United States, but after FTX reversed its plan, they now feel ￰12￱ also hope this step will speed up future decisions about how much money they can collect from the remaining ￰13￱ founder of FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried, will attend his appeal hearing in New York to challenge his conviction for ￰14￱ continues to defend himself and says FTX and its trading firm, Alameda Research, were not insolvent when the company collapsed in ￰15￱ founder explains that his company had more than enough assets to survive the crisis, but bankruptcy lawyers exaggerated its financial problems and shut down the firm too ￰16￱ lawyers also sold valuable assets for far less than they were worth, and this made the situation that FTX was in look worse than it really ￰17￱ of Bankman-Fried’s supporters say poor management was the reason the company collapsed in the first place, but legal experts and former employees ￰18￱ say billions of dollars in customer funds went missing, and records showed large amounts of money had been transferred to ￰19￱ you're reading this, you’re already ￰20￱ there with our newsletter .