Expert to XRP Holders: Ripple Endgame Is Always About XRP Price

A fresh debate has surfaced within the XRP community regarding Ripple’s long-term strategy and whether its ambitions ultimately center on the market performance of ￰0￱ conversation began after developer Vincent Van Code suggested that Ripple’s primary objective has always been tied to the XRP Ledger (XRPL) and its native token, rather than to side ventures such as stablecoins or cross-border payment ￰1￱ will everyone just accept that Ripple endgame has ALWAYS been XRPL and ￰2￱ stablecoins, not cross border, just establishing a global liquidity on chain, using XRP, #TheLiquidityTokenXRP — Vincent Van Code (@vincent_vancode) October 20, 2025 Analysts Argue Ripple’s Strategy Relies on XRP Growth According to Van Code, the company’s broader vision is to establish global on-chain liquidity powered by the XRPL, positioning XRP as the foundation for large-scale financial ￰3￱ comments reignited a long-standing belief among some investors that Ripple’s business model is directly dependent on XRP’s ￰4￱ proponent Digital Asset Investor reinforced this view, stating that the company’s success is inseparable from the eventual appreciation of ￰5￱ Ripple has consistently avoided making public projections about the token’s price, he argued that its financial structure leaves little doubt about the importance of a stronger XRP market.

Ripple’s reticence on price-related discussions is widely interpreted as a regulatory safeguard, particularly given its history of legal disputes with the ￰6￱ and Exchange Commission (SEC). However, the firm’s substantial XRP holdings, about 35 billion in escrow and an additional 5.01 billion readily available, clearly tie its financial health to the token’s ￰7￱ the current trading price of roughly $2.40 , every $1 increase would theoretically add around $40 billion to Ripple’s balance ￰8￱ Divided Over Ripple’s Direction Despite these perspectives, not everyone within the XRP ecosystem agrees that Ripple’s strategy revolves around XRP’s ￰9￱ critics argue that recent decisions contradict the company’s stated commitment to its own ￰10￱ instance, a well-known community member, Fishy Catfish, questioned why Ripple issued nearly 90% of its RLUSD stablecoin supply on Ethereum rather than the ￰11￱ from CryptoQuant supports this ￰12￱ shows that only 92.5 million RLUSD reside on the XRPL, while the total supply nears 900 ￰13￱ move has led some to interpret Ripple’s strategy as a vote of no confidence in its native network.

“Not even Ripple wants to use XRP or XRPL,” Catfish remarked, describing the chain as outdated and underused. Meanwhile, other users maintain that XRP has always been intended as a bridge asset for cross-border liquidity solutions, a mission Ripple has championed since its ￰14￱ question whether the company’s new initiatives signal a shift away from that original ￰15￱ are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Ripple’s Quiet Endgame Still Centers on XRP Despite internal disagreements, market observers highlight Ripple’s continuous efforts to integrate XRP into institutional ￰16￱ partnerships with firms such as GTreasury , Evernorth , and Japan’s SBI Holdings illustrate that the company is still expanding practical use cases for the ￰17￱ addition, Ripple is reportedly supporting initiatives to establish a major public XRP treasury , a long-term accumulation strategy designed to mirror how other firms have driven value appreciation through controlled supply ￰18￱ Ripple avoids explicitly connecting its success to XRP’s price movements, most analysts agree that the two remain closely ￰19￱ the company deepens its presence in institutional finance and continues to build liquidity infrastructure around the XRPL, community members see growing evidence that the company’s ultimate objective is inseparable from the value of XRP ￰20￱ : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial ￰21￱ views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s ￰22￱ are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment ￰23￱ action taken by the reader is strictly at their own ￰24￱ Tabloid is not responsible for any financial ￰25￱ us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News