Bitwise’s Proposed Solana Staking ETF With 0.20% Annual Fee Could Spur Fee Competition

COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup Trade with pro tools Fast execution, robust charts, clean risk ￰0￱ account → Bitwise has amended its US Solana ETF filing to add staking and set an annual management fee of 0.20%, positioning the offering as a competitively priced, physically backed Solana staking ETF with strong inflow potential versus higher-fee alternatives. 0.20% annual fee on Bitwise Solana Staking ETF Physically backed Solana with a staking feature and mid-range fee compared with ￰1￱ reaction highlights fee competition; tracking and inflows will determine market ￰2￱ ETF: Bitwise files a 0.20% Solana Staking ETF with physical backing and staking — read expert analysis, fee comparison, and inflow outlook ￰3￱ is seemingly already moving to undercut other issuers with its Solana Staking ETF, proposing an annual fee of just 0.20%.

Asset manager Bitwise amended its US filing to propose a Solana Staking ETF with a 0.20% annual management fee and a staking ￰4￱ analysts say the fee signals likely fee competition among issuers and could boost inflows if tracking and custody are ￰5￱ recommends • Exchange signup Clear control for futures Sizing, stops, and scenario planning ￰6￱ futures account → Solana is up 6.11% over the past 30 days, trading at $227 at the time of publication.) and include an on-chain staking feature, with an annual management fee of 0.20%. The filing updates the original application to add staking and to set the fee ￰7￱ does the 0.20% fee compare to other crypto ETFs?

The 0.20% fee sits in the mid-range for crypto ETFs, where fees typically span 0.15%–0.75%. For context, the first Solana staking ETF listed (REX-Osprey Solana Staking ETF, SSK) charges 0.75% and had $12 million of inflows on ￰8￱ fees historically attract more assets under management (AUM), especially for retail and institutional allocation ￰9￱ does staking matter for a Solana ETF? Staking adds potential yield by participating in network validation, which can be shared with ETF holders after fees. A staking-enabled ETF can differentiate on total return versus a pure spot ETF, but it also requires robust custody, validator selection, and operational transparency to manage slashing and reward distribution ￰10￱ are the market and analyst reactions?

ETF analysts noted the low fee as a deliberate competitive ￰11￱ comments described the 0.20% fee as an aggressive pricing tactic likely intended to capture flows ￰12￱ also contrasted Bitwise’s filing with SSK’s higher fee and noted reported tracking issues with some competing ￰13￱ could approval and launches occur? Industry forecasts have suggested possible approvals for staking-enabled Solana ETFs in the weeks following ￰14￱ SEC timelines remain uncertain; approval windows depend on regulatory review, operational readiness, and any additional information requests from regulators. , "description": "Bitwise amends its Solana ETF filing to include staking and sets a 0.20% management ￰15￱ reaction and fee comparison included.", , Frequently Asked Questions How does Bitwise’s 0.20% fee affect investors?

Lower fees reduce drag on returns and can attract both retail and institutional ￰16￱ long-term holders, a 0.20% fee materially improves net performance versus higher-fee alternatives over multi-year ￰17￱ staking change Solana ETF returns? ￰18￱ can add incremental yield to total returns, but net benefit depends on the fee structure, validator performance, and any operational costs associated with ￰19￱ Takeaways Fee advantage : Bitwise’s 0.20% positions the ETF competitively versus higher-fee staking ￰20￱ design : Physical backing plus staking can boost total return but requires reliable custody and validator ￰21￱ view : Fee competition may drive inflows; tracking accuracy and operational transparency will be key ￰22￱ Bitwise’s amended Solana ETF filing, with its 0.20% fee and staking feature, signals intensified fee competition in the Solana ETF ￰23￱ should weigh fee savings against tracking, custody, and staking execution when evaluating ￰24￱ filings and regulatory updates for final approvals and product ￰25￱ recommends • Exchange signup Smarter ￰26￱ ￰27￱ analytics and risk features in one ￰28￱ up →