TL;DR Last Friday’s ~$19B+ liquidation cascade reset positioning across crypto; this week’s action has been a shaky retest rather than a clean recovery, with BTC probing the low ~100Ks and failing multiple reclaim attempts. Den’s “line in the sand” on BTC: ~$98K. If it can hold above that level, there’s room for a base (but it might take time). Macro watchlist driving chop: China–U.
S. tariff rhetoric , private-credit & regional bank stress headlines , CPI into month-end , and earnings season spillover into 0 bottoms form (Den’s checklist): reclaim logical levels, flip EMAs on mid-timeframes, and let time do its job — outlier flushes often require weeks (not hours) of digestion. Alts: TOTAL3/“Others” are back at key support; BTC dominance still leaning up . Translation: majors must lead before breadth 1 over prediction: “It’s okay to not know.” Either buy deep sweeps at pre-mapped demand or wait for strength/confirmation — not the chop 2 just happened (and why it matters) Den and Matt opened with the obvious: a historic leverage flush that rivaled anything we’ve seen for speed and 3 plus outsized open interest made the market fragile; one negative macro impulse was enough to cascade perps, trip liquidations and erase weeks of structure in one hour 4 then, attempts to reclaim “lost” ranges have mostly failed at resistance .
Think: pushes toward ~115K on BTC followed by rejections and closes beneath key daily EMAs. It’s classic post-shock behavior: bidders are cautious, liquidity is thinner, and every headline swings risk. “ We’re right below resistance, but also right above the last-chance supports. It’s chop city — until it’s not. ” — Den Macro: the overhangs that can amplify every move Tariff headlines: Conflicting signaling around China–U. S.
trade keeps volatility elevated. Den’s rule: avoid trading the noise; anchor to dated catalysts and price levels 5 credit & regional banks: A run of lender stress stories risks morphing from “one-offs” into systemic-feeling 6 that narrative builds, expect risk-off reflexes across equities and 7 & policy: CPI at month-end and an upcoming rate decision can shift the tone, even if cuts are expected. Earnings: Not crypto-specific, but equity reactions matter while crypto trades like high-beta 8 line: uncertainty is the theme — and markets hate 9 wide ranges and headline whips until a few of these dominoes fall into place. BTC: the “last stand” zone Den’s map is stark: Support that must hold: around ~$98K — “last resort for bulls this cycle.” Why it’s tricky: Price is squeezed between that support and nearby resistance after failing multiple EMAs/reclaims.
What strength would actually look like: on the 4h/1D, EMAs reclaimed and curling up , reclaim + hold of recently lost shelves, and higher lows that don’t get stuffed the next 10 then, assume time-based 11 analogs suggest these zones often need weeks of grinding before trend returns — if support 12 and the majors: follow the leader ETH tried to reclaim the quarterly open / range highs — and got 13 read is simple: majors have to print strength signals first , or nothing else sticks. Breadth, TOTAL3 & BTC. D: why alts look heavy TOTAL3 / “Others”: sitting near yearly opens/mid-range supports after rejecting mid-range 14 are “could bottom here, but needs time” 15 Dominance (BTC.
D): still grinding up — historically a headwind for alts until majors stabilize. Translation: this isn’t the tape to force broad alt 16 breadth prove itself first. Den’s process: two valid entry archetypes Den was blunt: after an outlier event, “not knowing” is a 17 sweep punt: A fast, obvious wick into pre-mapped weekly demand (e. g., a dramatic stab under ~98K that instantly reclaims).
Tight invalidation, small size, accept it’s a “last resort” style 18 Wait for level reclaims + EMA flips on the 4h/1D and build into continuation. There’s ample upside if a real trend resets; you don’t need the exact 19 both: position sizing and invalidation 20 martingales into 21 bottoms tend to form (Den’s checklist) Reclaim lost levels and hold (no immediate fail/reject). EMAs flip on mid-timeframes after time-based 22 breakdowns become new demand on 23 improves: TOTAL3/“Others” break and hold above supply; BTC. D 24 stops getting worse (neutral > “good” at first).
If you’re not seeing these, it’s probably still a base-building phase — not a new 25 (next 1–2 weeks) Respect ~$98K on BTC as the key 26 majors 27 BTC and ETH show strength; only expand to alts if breadth breaks out and 28 entries only: Breakout-strength: fresh level breaks that hold with EMAs aligned. Retest-logic: violent flush into pre-mapped demand with immediate 29 rules: define invalidation in advance and size so a stop equals a known% of portfolio 30 chop traps: if price is wedged between nearby resistance and “last stand” support, do 31 the replay & follow along Catch the full replay on YouTube: Follow @krakenfx , @krakenpro and @Dentoshi for stream times, charts and 32 Trading Spaces recap series keeps the format consistent so you can skim the TL;DR , then dive into levels and process when markets get 33 with Dentoshi on Kraken Pro
Story Tags

Latest news and analysis from Kraken Blog


