Solana ETF race heats up as firms resubmit revised filings with SEC

The race to launch the first ￰0￱ exchange-traded fund (ETF) has ￰1￱ asset managers, including Canary Capital, Franklin Templeton, VanEck, Fidelity, Grayscale, CoinShares, and Bitwise, have all submitted amended S-1 registration statements to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These new filings are not entirely new proposals. Instead, they illuminate prior submissions , demonstrating that issuers continuously dialogue with ￰2￱ observers consider a figure of that magnitude as evidence that something is happening behind the scenes, even if a green light hasn’t been ￰3￱ changes are not ￰4￱ filings provide granular details about staking strategies, fee regimes, and redemption ￰5￱ example, the digital asset investment firm Grayscale announced plans to levy a 2.5% fee that would be paid in Solana ￰6￱ have specified how in-kind redemptions might work, as one could convert ETF shares into Solana rather than ￰7￱ analyst James Seyffart recently observed that the flood of filings demonstrates that the SEC is working with several firms ￰8￱ increasing number of submissions proves Solana’s ascent into a serious institutional-grade ￰9￱ is now viewed as no longer a purely retailer-driven token but one that large managers can’t wait to package for regulated ￰10￱ addition to the historical audit trail, he says that Solana’s GDP data implementation proves that the network has begun to be seen as legitimate beyond finance ￰11￱ takes sole staking role as custody and transparency improve One of the most significant updates in Canary Capital’s revised filing is the designation of Marinade Select as the exclusive staking provider for its proposed Solana ETF, marking the first time a ￰12￱ has outlined a clear, institutional-grade staking ￰13￱ to the filing, most of the ETF’s Solana holdings will be staked with Marinade for at least two ￰14￱ rewards will be auto-compounded after fees, aiding in bumping the fund’s net asset ￰15￱ introduces a yield factor to the ETF, and may make it more appealing to investors than pure passive crypto ￰16￱ specificity has also been outlined on custody ￰17￱ will be divided between hot and cold wallets, with the custodian exclusively holding private ￰18￱ themselves will not handle the tokens, but the filings warn that custody risks, like hacks or system failures, cannot be ￰19￱ response to concerns about transparency, the ETF’s website will disclose daily information such as net asset value, full holdings, and whether the shares are trading at a premium or ￰20￱ updated filings also include a discussion of the risks, updated to cover some recent accusations more ￰21￱ also now accommodate the ability that validators fail, the network goes offline, slashing might occur, or the trust may ignore certain forks and ￰22￱ rules shape Solana ETF prospects While several players are tweaking their proposals and others are in the regulators’ review process, the Solana ETF race is heating ￰23￱ will likely be a vested Solana ETF, as most crypto ETFs are pure play, except Ethereum, where the SEC had more comfort, given the amount of physical ￰24￱ stakes are ￰25￱ would signal that investors could get regulated exposure to Solana just as they now can with Bitcoin and ￰26￱ ETFs will pioneer new yield-generating strategies inside a regulated product if staking capabilities are ￰27￱ push indicates a broader trend for asset managers: cooperation with regulators, not ￰28￱ intend to conform to the SEC-led standards by revising and providing ￰29￱ investors, it signals the possibility that Solana, a risky, experimental blockchain not long ago, is on its way to becoming a mainstream financial ￰30￱ result is still far from certain, but the latest filings suggest clear ￰31￱ SEC’s response will not just impact Solana, but it could also determine the fate of crypto ETFs in the ￰32￱ your project in front of crypto’s top minds?

Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.