Anthropic agrees to landmark $1.5B copyright settlement in IP infringement lawsuit

Anthropic agreed to pay $1.5 billion to settle a major copyright lawsuit after authors said the company used pirated books to train its Claude AI chatbot without ￰0￱ proposed class-action deal is the biggest copyright payout ever reported and the first major settlement tied to artificial ￰1￱ Judge William Alsup in San Francisco approves it, the deal will pay hundreds of thousands of authors and set a new standard for how AI companies use copyrighted ￰2￱ comes after a ￰3￱ allowed a group of authors to proceed with a lawsuit against AI firm Anthropic, alleging their books were used without consent to train its artificial intelligence ￰4￱ authors, all established professionals, claim Anthropic used their copyrighted works to train its Claude chatbot without permission or ￰5￱ argue the company went too far by leveraging their stories to make the AI sound more human, even imitating their writing styles and ￰6￱ secure record payout in copyright case The $1.5 billion settlement covers about 500,000 pirated books the company downloaded from online shadow libraries like Library Genesis, Pirate Library Mirror, and the Books3 ￰7￱ online libraries are popular sources of unauthorized digital copies of books that researchers and AI developers use for their ￰8￱ a long time, writers, publishers, and advocacy groups have criticized the repositories for undermining copyright ￰9￱ deal says that each writer whose book Anthropic illegally used as training data for its AI will receive about $3,000 in ￰10￱ further investigation discovers any additional work the company used in its dataset, the total amount could skyrocket beyond the initial $1.5 billion.

Anthropic’s case began in 2024 when authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson sued the company for copying their books without ￰11￱ on, hundreds of thousands of other writers filed a lawsuit, claiming the company used their works to train its flagship chatbot, ￰12￱ authors flagged Anthropic’s ignorance of licensing the material legitimately despite its financial status, as seen in its powerful investors, like Amazon and Google’s parent company ￰13￱ William Alsup ruled in June that using copyrighted material to train AI models could be considered fair use if the works were ￰14￱ he also said that Anthropic violated copyright law when it downloaded and stored over 7,000,000 pirated books in a central ￰15￱ ruling exposed the company to damages if the lawsuit went to trial as scheduled in December because legal experts warned that Anthropic could have to pay hundreds of billions of ￰16￱ avoids trial but still faces legal risks The terms of the $1.5 billion settlement require Anthropic to destroy every copy of the pirated books to prevent it from continuing to benefit from unauthorized material.

However, experts say the agreement doesn’t protect the company from fresh ￰17￱ could still sue if the Claude system generated outputs that reproduce copyrighted passages or infringe on their ￰18￱ said the deal did not include an admission of liability, but rather that it wanted to move forward without the uncertainty of a lengthy ￰19￱ company’s deputy general counsel, Aparna Sridhar, explained that Anthropic is still committed to producing safe, trustworthy, and supportive of human ￰20￱ said the company wants to concentrate on developing tools that improve science and serve the public rather than spending years locked in court ￰21￱ AI companies like OpenAI, Microsoft, and Meta still face lawsuits that raise nearly identical copyright concerns.

A judge in San Francisco recently allowed a lawsuit against Meta to continue, saying the use of copyrighted material without permission is unlawful “in many circumstances.” Settling saved Anthropic the possibility of dragging the dispute to the ￰22￱ Court because this could’ve brought massive changes to national laws around how fair use applies to artificial intelligence. Don’t just read crypto ￰23￱ ￰24￱ to our newsletter. It's free .